Skip navigation and go to main content

SCC Seal and link to SCC home page
Sacramento City
College


 

 






















 
 

Kelly L. Gould

Administration Of Justice


Chapter 10

CHAPTER 10

<DIR>

Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections

</DIR>

Offenders Under Correctional Supervision in the U.S. by Type of Supervision

 

 

 

<DIR>

Probation

</DIR>

Probation:

Probation

<DIR>

History: England during 1300s

</DIR>

Probation

<DIR>

History: United States

</DIR>

Probation

<DIR>

History: United States

</DIR>

Probation

Probation

Percentage of Convicted Felony Offenders Receiving Probation

 

Probation

Probation Conditions

<DIR>

obey laws

maintain employment

remain within jurisdiction

allow probation officer to visit home or work place

pay court ordered fines

</DIR>

Probation Conditions

<DIR>

Depending on the case, a judge may add some or all of these specific conditions:

surrender driver’s license

submit to warrantless searches

not use/possess or control any illegal drugs

supply breath, urine, and/or blood specimens

successfully pass G.E.D. test

not socialize with certain people

participate in treatment programs

 

Parole

</DIR>

Parole:

Parole

Parole

<DIR>

parole boards

<DIR>

grant paroles based on review of each case

considered "discretionary" parole

</DIR>

statutory decree

<DIR>

mandatory parole

automatic after offender serves certain amount of time

</DIR></DIR>

Extent of Parole

Parole Boards in the U.S.

 

Parole Conditions

<DIR>

similar to probation conditions

must periodically report to parole officer

must maintain employment

must pay fines and restitution

must sometimes pay a "parole supervisory fee"

</DIR>

Federal Probation

<DIR>

1925 National Probation Act

</DIR>

Federal Parole

Advantages of Probation and Parole

<DIR>

low cost

increased employment

restitution

community support

reduced risk of criminal sanctions

increased use of community services

better rehabilitation opportunities

</DIR>

Disadvantages of Parole

 

<DIR>

relative lack of punishment

increased risk to community

higher social costs

 

The Legal Environment

</DIR>

Griffin v. Wisconsin (1987)

<DIR>

The Legal Environment

Supreme Court ruled that probation officers may conduct searches of a probationer’s residence without a search warrant or probable cause.

</DIR>

Griffin v. Wisconsin (1987)

<DIR>

The Legal Environment

Though the 4th Amendment normally provides for privacy, probation "presents special needs beyond normal law enforcement that may justify departures."

</DIR>

Mempa v. Rhay (1967)

<DIR>

The Legal Environment

U.S. Supreme Court held that in probation revocation decisions both notice and a fair hearing are required and probationer must have the opportunity to be represented by counsel.

</DIR>

Morrissey v. Brewer (1972)

<DIR>

The Legal Environment

U.S. Supreme Court held that parole revocation

proceedings require the following:

written notice of specific alleged violation

disclosure of evidence of violation

an impartial hearing body

opportunity to offer a defense

a right to cross examine witnesses

a written statement of the outcome

</DIR>

Probation/Parole Officers

<DIR>

1996

</DIR>

Probation/Parole Officers

<DIR>

Problems/Difficulties with Job:

<DIR>

large caseloads

lack of job mobility

few career advancement opportunities

conflicting models of the job:

social work model (stresses service role)

—correctional model (stresses control)

 

</DIR>

Intermediate Sanctions

</DIR>

Intermediate Sanctions

<DIR>

The use of non-traditional sentences in lieu

of imprisonment and fines, including:

split sentences

shock probation/parole

shock incarceration

mixed sentences and community service

intensive supervision

home confinement and electronic monitoring

</DIR>

Split Sentencing:

Shock Probation/Parole:

Shock Incarceration:

Intermediate Sanctions

<DIR>

Mixed Sentencing and Community Service

community service – can include the washing of police cars, cleaning graffiti, refurbishing public facilities, etc.

requires offenders to spend weekends in jail while being free during the week to pursue
education or employment while under probation supervision

</DIR>

Intermediate Sanctions

<DIR>

Intensive Supervision

Georgia (1982) was first to use intensive supervision

form of probation that requires frequent face- to-face contact with probation officer

mandatory curfew

employment required

frequent check of local arrest records

unannounced drug testing

</DIR>

Intermediate Sanctions

<DIR>

Home Confinement and Electronic

Monitoring

Sometimes called "house arrest"

May leave home in emergency

Used with some pregnant women, geriatric offenders with special needs, the terminally ill, and other special offender categories

</DIR>

Future of Probation
and Parole

<DIR>

Many problems with and criticisms of both probation and parole

Major Issue: regaining the public’s trust that probation and parole can provide meaningful and credible sanctions

</DIR>
.


Sacramento City College
3835 Freeport Blvd * Sacramento * CA * 95822
This page was last updated: Monday, October 17, 2005 at 9:11:19 AM